We handle GDPR and the EU AI Act, so your team does not have to.
Health data is regulated for good reason, and the rules got harder. GDPR Article 9 already treats patient data as a special category. The EU AI Act now adds obligations on top for anyone putting AI near clinical decisions.
Most clinics discover this when someone asks for evidence, not before. Compliance written after the build is a document. Compliance built into the system is a defence.
Not every use of AI in a clinic is high risk under the Act. We classify what you actually run, in writing, so the obligations are known rather than assumed.
Article 9 handling, role-based access and audit logging ship with the work rather than arriving as a policy afterwards.
Every AI action is recorded with what it did and why. When a regulator or a hospital procurement team asks, the answer is a log, not a meeting.
Documentation nobody has read protects nobody. Your team gets the short version of what they must do and why.
From compliance as a document to compliance you can demonstrate.
It applies to the system, not the size of the clinic. If AI touches a clinical pathway you have obligations. We classify what you run so you know which apply, rather than guessing in either direction.
In the EU, under contract, and never used to train a model. We put that in writing before a single record moves.
Yes, and it goes better when we do. We supply the technical evidence and documentation; they keep the legal position.